Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • Author: Luca Persani x
  • Goiter and thyroid nodules x
Clear All Modify Search
Stamatina Ioakim CEDM, Centre of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Limassol, Cyprus
Medical School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Stamatina Ioakim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Akheel A Syed Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Obesity Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation & University Teaching Trust, Salford, UK
Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Gastroenterology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Search for other papers by Akheel A Syed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
George Zavros CEDM, Centre of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Limassol, Cyprus

Search for other papers by George Zavros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michalis Picolos Alithias Endocrinology Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus

Search for other papers by Michalis Picolos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Luca Persani Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Luca Persani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Angelos Kyriacou CEDM, Centre of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Limassol, Cyprus
Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Obesity Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation & University Teaching Trust, Salford, UK
Medical School, European University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus

Search for other papers by Angelos Kyriacou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Background

The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines recommend the following size cut-offs based on sonographic appearances for subjecting nodules to fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy: low risk: 15 mm and intermediate risk and high risk: 10 mm.

Objective

We conducted a ‘real-world’ study evaluating the diagnostic performance of the ATA cut-offs against increased thresholds, in the interest of safely limiting FNAs.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 604 nodules which were sonographically risk-stratified as per the ATA Guidelines and subsequently subjected to ultrasound-guided FNA. Nodules were cytologically stratified into ‘benign’ (Bethesda class 2) and ‘non-benign’ (Bethesda classes 3–6). We obtained the negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, FNAs that could be spared, missed ‘non-benign’ cytologies and missed carcinomas on histology, according to the ATA cut-offs compared to higher cut-offs.

Results

In low-risk nodules, the high performance of NPV (≈91%) is unaffected by increasing the cut-off to 25 mm, and accuracy improves by 39.4%; 46.8% of FNAs could be spared at the expense of few missed B3–B6 cytologies (7.9%) and no missed carcinomas. In intermediate-risk nodules, a 15 mm cut-off increases the NPV by 11.3% and accuracy by 40.7%. The spared FNAs approach 50%, while B3–B6 cytologies are minimal, with no missed carcinomas. In high-risk nodules, low NPV (<35%) and accuracy (<46%) were obtained regardless of cut-off. Moreover, the spared FNAs achieved at higher cut-offs involved numerous missed ‘non-benign’ cytologies and carcinomas.

Conclusion

It would be clinically safe to increase the ATA cut-offs for FNA in low-risk nodules to 25 mm and in intermediate-risk nodules to 15 mm.

Open access
Laura Fugazzola Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Laura Fugazzola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maurilio Deandrea Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Department and Center for Thyroid Diseases, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy

Search for other papers by Maurilio Deandrea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stefano Borgato Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Stefano Borgato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marco Dell’Acqua Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Marco Dell’Acqua in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Francesca Retta Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Department and Center for Thyroid Diseases, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy

Search for other papers by Francesca Retta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alberto Mormile Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Department and Center for Thyroid Diseases, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy

Search for other papers by Alberto Mormile in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chiara Carzaniga Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Chiara Carzaniga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Giacomo Gazzano Pathology Unit, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Giacomo Gazzano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gabriele Pogliaghi Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Gabriele Pogliaghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marina Muzza Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Marina Muzza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Luca Persani Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Luca Persani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Background

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is effective in the treatment of thyroid nodules, leading to a 50–90% reduction with respect to baseline. Current guidelines indicate the need for a benign cytology prior to RFA, though, on the other side, this procedure is also successfully used for the treatment of papillary microcarcinomas. No specific indications are available for nodules with an indeterminate cytology (Bethesda III/IV).

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy of RFA in Bethesda III nodules without genetic alterations as verified by means of a custom panel.

Methods

We have treated 33 patients (mean delivered energy 1069 ± 1201 J/mL of basal volume) with Bethesda III cytology, EU-TIRADS 3-4, and negative genetic panel. The mean basal nodular volume was 17.3 ± 10.7 mL.

Results

Considering the whole series, the mean volume reduction rate (VRR) was 36.8 ± 16.5% at 1 month, 59.9 ± 15.5% at 6 months, and 62 ± 15.7% at 1-year follow-up. The sub-analysis done in patients with 1 and 2 years follow-up data available (n = 20 and n = 5, respectively) confirmed a progressive nodular volume decrease. At all-time points, the rate of reduction was statistically significant (P < 0.0001), without significant correlation between the VRR and the basal volume. Neither cytological changes nor complications were observed after the procedure.

Conclusion

RFA is effective in Bethesda III, oncogene-negative nodules, with reduction rates similar to those obtained in confirmed benign lesions. This procedure represents a good alternative to surgery or active surveillance in this particular class of nodules, regardless of their initial volume. A longer follow-up will allow to evaluate further reduction or possible regrowth.

Open access