Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Author: Murat Faik Erdogan x
  • Thyroid cancer - clinical x
Clear All Modify Search
Adile Begüm Bahçecioğlu Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Search for other papers by Adile Begüm Bahçecioğlu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alptekin Gürsoy Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara Guven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Search for other papers by Alptekin Gürsoy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Serpil Dizbay Sak Department of Pathology, Ankara University, School of Medicine Ankara, Turkey

Search for other papers by Serpil Dizbay Sak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Seyfettin Ilgan Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara Guven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Search for other papers by Seyfettin Ilgan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Banu Bilezikçi Department of Pathology, Ankara Guven Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Search for other papers by Banu Bilezikçi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Murat Faik Erdoğan Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ankara University, School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Search for other papers by Murat Faik Erdoğan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Objective

Punctate echogenic foci (PEF)/microcalcifications are thought to represent psammoma bodies (PB) in histopathology. However, there are few and contradictory data on this. Different types of sonographic echogenic microfoci (EMF) are seen in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), and their histopathological equivalents are not clearly known. There is also conflicting data on the interobserver agreement between the sonographers on EMF.

Methods

We prospectively collected US video records of PTC nodules with and without EMF in two large thyroid centers. All video recordings were independently interpreted by three blinded, experienced sonographers. EMF were classified as true microcalcifications (punctate echogenic foci (PEF) ≤1 mm long), linear microechogenities (>1 mm long, posterior acoustic enhancement of the back wall of a microcystic area), comet-tail artifacts/reverberations or linear microechogenities with comet-tail artifacts/reverberations, non-shadowing coarse echogenic foci (>1 mm nonlinear areas) and unclassifiable. Histopathological evaluation was performed by two blinded, qualified pathologists.

Results

A total of 114 malignant nodules were included. The average Cohen’s kappa (κ) of three sonographers for the EMF presence was 0.775, indicating substantial agreement. A substantial agreement for PEF with 0.658 κ, only fair agreement for other types of EMF with 0.052 to 0.296 κ were detected. EMF were significantly associated with PB and papillae. PEF had an evident relationship with PB in multivariate analysis. There was a strong positive correlation between the amount of PEF and PB (r = 0.634, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

PEF in PTC mainly correspond to PB on histopathology. Although observation of EMF varies among sonographers, this inconsistency can be reduced by classifying EMF into subgroups and keeping the term ‘PEF’ only for true microcalcifications.

Open access