Search Results
Division of Interventional Radiology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Giovanni Mauri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laszlo Hegedüs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven Bandula in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roberto Luigi Cazzato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agnieszka Czarniecka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Oliver Dudeck in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Laura Fugazzola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Romana Netea-Maier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gilles Russ in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Göran Wallin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Enrico Papini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The growing detection of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs) is paralleled by an increase in surgical procedures. Due to the frequent indolent nature, cost, and risk of surgery, active surveillance (AS) and ultrasound-guided minimally invasive treatments (MITs) are in suitable cases of incidental PTMC proposed as alternatives to thyroidectomy. Surgery and radioiodine are the established treatments for relapsing cervical differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) metastases. But radioiodine refractoriness, risk of surgical complications, adverse influence on quality of life, or declining repeat surgery have led to AS and MIT being considered as alternatives for slow-growing DTC nodal metastases. Also, for distant radioiodine-refractory metastases not amenable to surgery, MIT is proposed as part of a multimodality therapeutic approach. The European Thyroid Association and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe commissioned these guidelines for the appropriate use of MIT. Based on a systematic PubMed search, an evidence-based approach was applied, and both knowledge and practical experience of the panelists were incorporated to develop the manuscript and the specific recommendations. We recommend that when weighing between surgery, radioiodine, AS, or MIT for DTC, a multidisciplinary team including members with expertise in interventional radiology assess the demographic, clinical, histological, and imaging characteristics for appropriate selection of patients eligible for MIT. Consider TA in low-risk PTMC patients who are at surgical risk, have short life expectancy, relevant comorbidities, or are unwilling to undergo surgery or AS. As laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, and microwave ablation are similarly safe and effective thermal ablation (TA) techniques, the choice should be based on the specific competences and resources of the centers. Use of ethanol ablation and high-intensity focused ultrasound is not recommended for PTMC treatment. Consider MIT as an alternative to surgical neck dissection in patients with radioiodine refractory cervical recurrences who are at surgical risk or decline further surgery. Factors that favor MIT are previous neck dissection, presence of surgical complications, small size metastases, and <4 involved latero-cervical lymph nodes. Consider TA among treatment options in patients with unresectable oligometastatic or oligoprogressive distant metastases to achieve local tumor control or pain palliation. Consider TA, in combination with bone consolidation and external beam radiation therapy, as a treatment option for painful bone metastases not amenable to other established treatments.
Search for other papers by Cosimo Durante in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laszlo Hegedüs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agnieszka Czarniecka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ralf Paschke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gilles Russ in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fernando Schmitt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paula Soares in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tamas Solymosi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Enrico Papini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
With the widespread use of sensitive imaging techniques, which include neck visualization, a conspicuous number of thyroid nodules emerge and demand attention. Most lesions are benign, asymptomatic, and do not warrant treatment. In the case of cancer diagnosis, most are small, intrathyroidal and indolent neoplasms that can safely be managed conservatively. There is a pronounced need for more cost-effective, risk-adapted approaches to the management of this highly prevalent condition, taking the wishes of the patient into consideration. Thus, the present guidelines aim at providing a clinical practice guide for the initial workup and the subsequent management of adult individuals harboring thyroid nodules. Importantly, these guidelines are not intended to cover the management of thyroid malignancy. The manuscript and the specific recommendations were developed by reconciling the best available research evidence with the knowledge and clinical experience of the panelists and updating aspects of a number of previous European Thyroid Association guidelines.
Search for other papers by Chantal A Lebbink in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thera P Links in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agnieszka Czarniecka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Renuka P Dias in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rossella Elisei in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Louise Izatt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Heiko Krude in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kerstin Lorenz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Luster in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kate Newbold in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Arnoldo Piccardo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manuel Sobrinho-Simões in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Toru Takano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A S Paul van Trotsenburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frederik A Verburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hanneke M van Santen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
At present, no European recommendations for the management of pediatric thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) exist. Differences in clinical, molecular, and pathological characteristics between pediatric and adult DTC emphasize the need for specific recommendations for the pediatric population. An expert panel was instituted by the executive committee of the European Thyroid Association including an international community of experts from a variety of disciplines including pediatric and adult endocrinology, pathology, endocrine surgery, nuclear medicine, clinical genetics, and oncology. The 2015 American Thyroid Association Pediatric Guideline was used as framework for the present guideline. Areas of discordance were identified, and clinical questions were formulated. The expert panel members discussed the evidence and formulated recommendations based on the latest evidence and expert opinion. Children with a thyroid nodule or DTC require expert care in an experienced center. The present guideline provides guidance for healthcare professionals to make well-considered decisions together with patients and parents regarding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of pediatric thyroid nodules and DTC.