Search Results
Search for other papers by Jacqueline Jonklaas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonio C. Bianco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anne R. Cappola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Francesco S. Celi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Fliers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Heike Heuer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizabeth A. McAninch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lars C. Moeller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Birte Nygaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna M. Sawka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Torquil Watt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Colin M. Dayan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background: Fourteen clinical trials have not shown a consistent benefit of combination therapy with levothyroxine (LT4) and liothyronine (LT3). Despite the publication of these trials, combination therapy is widely used and patients reporting benefit continue to generate patient and physician interest in this area. Recent scientific developments may provide insight into this inconsistency and guide future studies. Methods: The American Thyroid Association (ATA), British Thyroid Association (BTA), and European Thyroid Association (ETA) held a joint conference on November 3, 2019 (live-streamed between Chicago and London) to review new basic science and clinical evidence regarding combination therapy with presentations and input from 12 content experts. After the presentations, the material was synthesized and used to develop Summary Statements of the current state of knowledge. After review and revision of the material and Summary Statements, there was agreement that there was equipoise for a new clinical trial of combination therapy. Consensus Statements encapsulating the implications of the material discussed with respect to the design of future clinical trials of LT4/LT3 combination therapy were generated. Authors voted upon the Consensus Statements. Iterative changes were made in several rounds of voting and after comments from ATA/BTA/ETA members. Results: Of 34 Consensus Statements available for voting, 28 received at least 75% agreement, with 13 receiving 100% agreement. Those with 100% agreement included studies being powered to study the effect of deiodinase and thyroid hormone transporter polymorphisms on study outcomes, inclusion of patients dissatisfied with their current therapy and requiring at least 1.2 µg/kg of LT4 daily, use of twice daily LT3 or preferably a slow-release preparation if available, use of patient-reported outcomes as a primary outcome (measured by a tool with both relevant content validity and responsiveness) and patient preference as a secondary outcome, and utilization of a randomized placebo-controlled adequately powered double-blinded parallel design. The remaining statements are presented as potential additional considerations. Discussion: This article summarizes the areas discussed and presents Consensus Statements to guide development of future clinical trials of LT4/LT3 combination therapy. The results of such redesigned trials are expected to be of benefit to patients and of value to inform future thyroid hormone replacement clinical practice guidelines treatment recommendations.