Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

  • Author: Kristine Z Swan x
Clear All Modify Search
Kristine Z Swan Department of ORL, Head- and Neck Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Search for other papers by Kristine Z Swan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Johnson Thomas Department of Endocrinology, Mercy Hospital, Springfield, Missouri, USA

Search for other papers by Johnson Thomas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Viveque E Nielsen Department of ORL, Head- and Neck Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Search for other papers by Viveque E Nielsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marie Louise Jespersen Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Search for other papers by Marie Louise Jespersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Steen J Bonnema Department of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Search for other papers by Steen J Bonnema in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Background

Artificial intelligence algorithms could be used to risk-stratify thyroid nodules and may reduce the subjectivity of ultrasonography. One such algorithm is AIBx which has shown good performance. However, external validation is crucial prior to clinical implementation.

Materials and methods

Patients harboring thyroid nodules 1–4 cm in size, undergoing thyroid surgery from 2014 to 2016 in a single institution, were included. A histological diagnosis was obtained in all cases. Medullary thyroid cancer, metastasis from other cancers, thyroid lymphomas, and purely cystic nodules were excluded. Retrospectively, transverse ultrasound images of the nodules were analyzed by AIBx, and the results were compared with histopathology and Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS), calculated by experienced physicians.

Results

Out of 329 patients, 257 nodules from 209 individuals met the eligibility criteria. Fifty-one nodules (20%) were malignant. AIBx had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.2%. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values (PPV) were 78.4, 44.2, and 25.8%, respectively. Considering both TIRADS 4 and TIRADS 5 nodules as malignant lesions resulted in an NPV of 93.0%, while PPV and specificity were only 22.4 and 19.4%, respectively. By combining AIBx with TIRADS, no malignant nodules were overlooked.

Conclusion

When applied to ultrasound images obtained in a different setting than used for training, AIBx had comparable NPVs to TIRADS. AIBx performed even better when combined with TIRADS, thus reducing false negative assessments. These data support the concept of AIBx for thyroid nodules, and this tool may help less experienced operators by reducing the subjectivity inherent to thyroid ultrasound interpretation.

Open access