Search Results
You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :
- Author: Laura Fugazzola x
- Thyroid cancer - clinical x
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Carla Colombo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniele Ceruti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simone De Leo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Grzegorz Bilo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matteo Trevisan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Noemi Giancola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claudia Moneta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Gianfranco Parati in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Luca Persani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Laura Fugazzola in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background
Hypertension (HTN) is the most frequent adverse event during treatment with lenvatinib (LEN), but data on its best management are limited.
Aim
The objective of this study was to assess incidence, features and best management of LEN-related HTN in a consecutive single tertiary-care centre cohort.
Methods
Twenty-nine patients were followed up for a mean time of 29.8 months (6–77 months).
Results
After a mean follow-up of 6.8 months, HTN was recorded in 76% of cases, as a de novo occurrence in half of them. HTN significantly correlated with LEN dose and was of grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3 in 5%, 50% and 45% of patients, respectively. The majority (77%) of patients with HTN developed proteinuria. There was no correlation between HTN and proteinuria or clinical features or best morphological response or any other adverse event (AE), with the exception of diarrhoea. Patients with or without pre-existing HTN or any other cardiovascular disease had a similar incidence of HTN during LEN, thus excluding the impact of this potential predisposing factor. After evaluation by a dedicated cardiologist, medical treatment was introduced in 21/22 patients (polytherapy in 20 of them). The most frequently used drugs were calcium channel blockers (CCBs) due to their effect on vasodilation. In case of poor control, CCBs were associated with one or more anti-hypertensive drug.
Conclusion
HTN is a frequent and early AE in patients on LEN treatment. We suggest a diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm to be applied in clinical practice to allow efficient HTN control and improve patient compliance, reducing LEN discontinuation.
