Search Results
Search for other papers by Markus Eszlinger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexandra Stephenson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shideh Mirhadi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Konrad Patyra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael F Moran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moosa Khalil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pediatrics, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Search for other papers by Jukka Kero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Heritage Medical Research Building, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Heritage Medical Research Building, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Search for other papers by Ralf Paschke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
Nonautoimmune hyperthyroidism (NAH) is rare and occurs due to a constitutively activating thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) mutation. In contrast to other thyroid nodules, no further evaluation for malignancy is recommended for hot thyroid nodules. In the first model for NAH in mice nearly all homozygous mice had developed papillary thyroid cancer by 12 months of age.
Methods
To further evaluate these mice, whole exome sequencing and phosphoproteome analysis were employed in a further generation of mice to identify any other mutations potentially responsible and to identify the pathways involved in thyroid carcinoma development.
Results
Only three genes (Nrg1, Rrs1, Rasal2) were mutated in all mice examined, none of which were known primary drivers of papillary thyroid cancer development. Wild-type and homozygous TSHR D633H knockin mice showed distinct phosphoproteome profiles with an enrichment of altered phosphosites found in ERK/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. Most importantly, phosphosites with known downstream effects included BRAF p.S766, which forms an inhibitory site: a decrease of phosphorylation at this site suggests an increase in MEK/ERK pathway activation. The decreased phosphorylation at BRAF p.S766 would suggest decreased AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling, which is supported by the decreased phosphorylation of STIM1 p.S257, a downstream AMPK target.
Conclusion
The modified phosphoproteome profile of the homozygous mice in combination with human literature suggests a potential signaling pathway from constitutive TSHR signaling and cAMP activation to the activation of ERK/MAPK signaling. This is the first time that a specific mechanism has been identified for a possible involvement of TSH signaling in thyroid carcinoma development.
Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
Search for other papers by Markus Eszlinger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul Stewardson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John B McIntyre in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Adrian Box in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moosa Khalil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Hyrcza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Konstantin Koro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dean Ruether in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jiahui Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ralf Paschke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective
The aim of the study was to identify patients with NTRK fusion-positive or RET fusion/mutation-positive thyroid cancers, who could benefit from neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor (NTRK) or receptor tyrosine kinase (RET) inhibitors.
Methods
Patients were identified in the Calgary prospective thyroid cancer database (N= 482). Patients were ‘pre-screened’ with clinically available MassARRAY® BRAF test, Colon Panel, Melanoma Panel, or ThyroSPEC™. Mutation-negative tumors were ‘screened’ for NTRK fusions and RET fusions/mutations with the Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 (OCAv3).
Results
A total of 86 patients were included in 1 of 2 separate analyses. Analysis A included 42 patients with radioactive iodine (RAI)-resistant distant metastases. After pre-screening, 20 BRAF and RAS mutation-negative patients underwent OCAv3 screening, resulting in the detection of 4 patients with NTRKfusions and 4 patients with RET fusions (8/20, 40% of analyzed patients). Analysis B included 44 patients, 42 with American Thyroid Association (ATA) high and intermediate risk of recurrence and 2 with medullary thyroid carcinoma. During pre-screening, 1 patient with an NTRK fusion, 1 patient with a RET fusion, and 30 patients with BRAF mutations were identified. The remaining 9 patients received OCAv3 screening, resulting in detection of 1 patient with an NTRKfusion and 1 with a RET fusion (4/11, 36% of analyzed patients).
Conclusions
Our findings indicate a higher rate of NTRK fusions and RETfusions in patients with thyroid cancer with RAI-resistant distant metastases and ATA high or intermediate risk of recurrence. This highlights the importance of early screening to enable intervention with a NTRK or RET inhibitor.
Search for other papers by Abdul Rehman Syed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Aakash Gorana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erik Nohr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xiaoli-Kat Yuan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Parthiv Amin MASc in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sana Ghaznavi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Debbie Lamb in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by John McIntyre in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Eszlinger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ralf Paschke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Context
Two-thirds of metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients have radioiodine (RAI)-resistant disease, resulting in poor prognosis and high mortality. For rare NTRK and RET fusion-positive metastatic, RAI-resistant thyroid cancers, variable success of re-induction of RAI avidity during treatment with NTRK or RET inhibitors has been reported.
Case presentation and results
We report two cases with RAI-resistant lung metastases treated with larotrectinib: an 83-year-old male presenting with an ETV6::NTRK3 fusion-positive tumor with the TERT promoter mutation c.-124C>T, and a 31-year-old female presenting with a TPR::NTRK1 fusion-positive tumor (and negative for TERT promoter mutation). Post larotrectinib treatment, diagnostic I-123 whole body scan revealed unsuccessful RAI-uptake re-induction in the TERT-positive tumor, with a thyroid differentiation score (TDS) of −0.287. In contrast, the TERT-negative tumor exhibited successful I-131 reuptake with a TDS of −0.060.
Conclusion
As observed for RAI-resistance associated with concurrent TERT and BRAF mutations, the co-occurrence of TERT mutations and NTRK fusions may also contribute to re-sensitization failure.
