Search Results
Search for other papers by Giorgio Grani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Livia Lamartina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Valeria Ramundo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosa Falcone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cristiano Lomonaco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura Ciotti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martina Barone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marianna Maranghi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vito Cantisani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sebastiano Filetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cosimo Durante in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction: A taller-than-wide (TTW) shape is a suspicious feature of thyroid nodules commonly defined as an anteroposterior/transverse diameter (AP/T) ratio >1. An intraobserver variability of up to 18% in AP diameter evaluations has been described, which may lead to overreporting of this feature. To potentially improve the reliability of the TTW definition, we propose an arbitrary ratio of ≥1.2. Objective: The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of this definition on diagnostic performance. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 553 thyroid nodules referred for cytology evaluation at an academic center. Before fine-needle aspiration, two examiners jointly defined all sonographic features considered in risk stratification systems developed by the American Thyroid Association (ATA), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), the American College of Radiology (ACR TIRADS), the European Thyroid Association (EU-TIRADS), and the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (K-TIRADS). TTW was defined according to the current definition (AP/T diameter ratio >1) and an arbitrary alternative definition (AP/T ratio >1.2). Results: The alternative definition classified fewer nodules as TTW (28, 5.1% vs. 94, 17%). The current and proposed definitions have a sensitivity of 26.2 and 11.9% (p = 0.03) and a specificity of 83.8 and 95.5% (p < 0.001). Thus, as a single feature, the arbitrary definition has a lower sensitivity and a higher specificity. When applied to sonographic risk stratification systems, however, the proposed definition would increase the number of avoided biopsies (up to 58.2% for ACR TIRADS) and the specificity of all systems, without negative impact on sensitivity or diagnostic odds ratio. Conclusions: Re-defining TTW nodules as those with an AP/T ratio ≥1.2 improves this marker’s specificity for malignancy. Using this definition in risk stratification systems will increase their specificity, reducing the number of suggested biopsies without significantly diminishing their overall diagnostic performance.