Search Results
Search for other papers by Tanja Diana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hans-Peter Holthoff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julia Fassbender in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Wüster in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Kanitz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George J. Kahaly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Ungerer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction: A novel long-term murine model for Graves’ disease (GD) using repeated, long-term immunizations with recombinant adenovirus expressing the extracellular A-subunit of the human thyrotropin receptor (Ad-TSHR) was applied to evaluate the functional anti-TSHR-antibody (TSHR-Ab) profile. Methods: BALB/c mice received 7 immunizations with either 10<sup>10</sup> plaque-forming units of Ad-TSHR or control Ad-GFP. Naïve (nonimmuized native) mice were also studied. Three 3-weekly immunizations were followed by 4-weekly boosts until the 7th immunization. Blocking (TBAb) and stimulating (TSAb) TSHR-Ab were measured with bioassays. Assay cut-offs for TBAb/TSAb were at 34% inhibition and a specimen-to-reference ratio (SRR) of 140%. Results: Nineteen (8 Ad-TSHR-, 4 Ad-GFP-immunized, and 7 native) mice were investigated. All native mice were negative for TSHR-binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (TBII) prior to immunization. Native and Ad-GFP mice were negative in weeks 17 and 27 for TBII and TBAb/TSAb. In native mice, the free thyroxine (fT4) levels (median [25th percentile; 75th percentile]) were in the upper normal range (1.2 ng/mL [1.1; 1.6]) prior to immunization, at weeks 17 (2.2 ng/mL [2.1; 2.4]) and 27 (1.4 ng/mL [1.1; 1.7]), respectively. In contrast, in Ad-TSHR-immunized mice, fT4 values were markedly increased at weeks 17 (4.4 ng/mL [3.9; 6]) and 27 (4.5 ng/mL [4.2; 6]) compared to those in Ad-GFP mice (2 ng/mL [1.8; 2.1] and 1.4 ng/mL [1.1; 1.6]), respectively (p = 0.0008, p = 0.001). In contrast, at week 17, in Ad-TSHR mice, the mean TBII, TBAb, and TSAb levels were 40 IU/L (40; 40); 62% inhibition (38; 69), and 116% SRR (97; 185), respectively; at week 27, they were 40 IU/L (39; 40); 65% inhibition (34; 80) and 95% SRR (63; 187), respectively. Three serum samples from Ad-TSHR mice (38%) demonstrated dual TBAb/TSAb positivity. Conclusions: TBAb/TSAb were highly prevalent in Ad-TSHR-immunized mice, thus confirming the successful establishment of a novel, long-term murine model for GD. All TBAb- and TSAb-positive Ad-TSHR-immunized mice were TBII-positive. Thus, the binding immunoassay did not differentiate between TSHR-Ab functionality.
Search for other papers by Tanja Diana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul D. Olivo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yie-Hwa Chang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Wüster in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Kanitz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George J. Kahaly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Objective: Stimulating thyrotropin-receptor antibodies (TSAb) cause Graves’ disease (GD). We tested a novel homogeneous fluorescent 3′,5′ cyclic adenine monophosphate (cAMP) assay for the detection of TSAb in a bioassay. Methods: Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines expressing either a chimeric (MC4) or wild-type (WT) TSH-R were incubated with the adenyl cyclase activator forskolin, a human TSAb monoclonal antibody (M22), and with sera from GD patients. Intracellular cAMP levels were measured using a Bridge-It® cAMP assay, and the results were compared with a luciferase-based bioassay. Results: Both cell lines were stimulated with forskolin concentrations (0.006–200 µM) in a dose-dependent manner. The linear range in the MC4 and WT cells was 0.8–25 and 3.1–50 µM, respectively. Levels of cAMP and luciferase in forskolin-treated MC4 and WT cells were positively correlated (r = 0.91 and 0.84, both p < 0.001). The 50% maximum stimulatory concentration of forskolin was more than 16-fold higher for the CHO-WT cells than the CHO-MC4 cells in the cAMP assay and 4-fold higher in the luciferase assay. Incubation of both cell lines with M22 (0.006–50 ng/mL) resulted in a dose-dependent increase in cAMP levels with linear ranges for the MC4 and WT cells of 0.8–12.5 and 0.2–3.125 ng/mL, respectively. Comparison of cAMP and luciferase levels in M22-treated MC4 and WT cells also showed a positive correlation (r = 0.88, p < 0.001 and 0.75, p = 0.002). A positive correlation was also noted when using patient samples (r = 0.96, p < 0.001) that were all TSH-R-Ab binding assay positive. Conclusion: The novel, rapid, simple-to-perform cAMP assay provides TSAb-mediated stimulatory results comparable to a luciferase-based bioassay.
Search for other papers by Tanja Diana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christian Wüster in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul D. Olivo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angelica Unterrainer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jochem König in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Kanitz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Artur Bossowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Brigitte Decallonne in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George J. Kahaly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Background: The measurement of TSH receptor (TSHR) antibodies is warranted for diagnosis of Graves’ disease (GD). Objective: The performance, detection sensitivity, and specificity of 6 TSHR immunoassays were compared. Methods: Two bioassays and 4 binding assays (Kronus, Immulite, Kryptor, Dynex) were compared in a dilution study performed in patients with autoimmune thyroid disease. Both bioassays were compared to 2 binding assays using stimulatory (M22) and blocking (K1–70) monoclonal antibody (MAb) mixtures. Results: Thirty samples from stimulatory (TSAb)-positive/blocking (TBAb)-negative patients with GD were diluted serially and measured in all assays. Samples were positive until dilution 1:2,187 in the TSAb bioassay, 1:81 in the Immulite (p < 0.002 vs. bioassay) and Kronus ELISA (p = 0.039) assays, and 1:27 in the Kryptor and Dynex ELISA (p < 0.001 vs. bioassay). Ten samples from TBAb-positive/TSAb-negative patients with GD or Hashimoto’s thyroiditis were positive in all binding assays. None of the binding assays differentiated between TSAb and TBAb. Mixtures of 100% K1–70 (200 ng/mL), 80% K1–70 + 20% M22, 60% K1–70 + 40% M22, 40% K1–70 + 60% M22, 20% K1–70 + 80% M22, and 100% M22 (20 ng/mL) tested positive in both Immulite (26.4, 20.2, 15.2, 10.5, 6.3, 2.00 IU/L) and Kronus assays (27.1, 23.3, 19.3, 12.0, 5.7, 2.2 IU/L). These MAb mixtures were tested in the TBAb bioassay and showed 82, 61, 24 (negative), –26 (negative), –77 (negative), and –95% (negative) inhibition, respectively. Conclusions: The sample dilution study showed higher detection sensitivity for the TSAb bioassay, and the antibody mixture study demonstrated exclusive specificity of the bioassays over all automated and ELISA binding assays.