Search Results
Search for other papers by Carles Zafon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Medicine, University of Alcalá de Henares, Madrid
Search for other papers by Juan J. Díez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
IdiSNA (Instituto de investigación en la salud de Navarra), Pamplona, Spain
Search for other papers by Juan C. Galofré in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David S. Cooper in
Google Scholar
PubMed
of them are listed in Table 1 . Currently no immunomarker has demonstrated enough diagnostic accuracy to be used alone. However, the combined analysis of galectin-3 and Hector Battifora mesothelial-1 has shown acceptable sensitivity and specificity
Search for other papers by Helmi Khadra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed Deniwar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Khuzema Mohsin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dominique Monlezun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emad Kandil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for the categorical variables. Validity analysis was applied in the calculation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value, negative predicative value (NPV), accuracy, and positive likelihood ratio
Search for other papers by Dong Gyu Na in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hye Sook Min in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hunkyung Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jae-Kyung Won in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hyo Bin Seo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ji-Hoon Kim in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Analysis and Statistics McNemar's test was used to compare each diagnostic result of RFNA and CNB in the overall and subcategories of the nodules, to compare the rate of management decision, and to compare the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis
Research Institute Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by Yalan Hu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Center for Regenerative Medicine (CReM) of Boston University and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Search for other papers by Lorraine Soares De Oliveira in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kim Falize in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Pediatric Endocrinology. Emma children’s hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Search for other papers by A S Paul van Trotsenburg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Search for other papers by Eric Fliers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The Pulmonary Center and Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Search for other papers by Joseph E Kaserman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The Pulmonary Center and Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Search for other papers by Andrew A Wilson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anthony N Hollenberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Search for other papers by Eveline Bruinstroop in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Research Institute Amsterdam Gastroenterology, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Search for other papers by Anita Boelen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
cannot interact with the TRs leads to the de-repression of positively regulated targets in the hypothyroid state ( 11 , 12 ). NCOR1 is also thought to be important in determining TH sensitivity and the set point of the HPT-axis ( 13 , 14 , 15 ). In
Search for other papers by Gilles Russ in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steen J. Bonnema in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Murat Faik Erdogan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cosimo Durante in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rose Ngu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laurence Leenhardt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
consistently predictive of malignancy and are used as criteria for FNA [ 3 - 6 ]. These criteria have various sensitivity and specificity, but unfortunately none of them alone is sufficient to discard or detect malignancy efficiently [ 7 - 10 ]. Furthermore
Search for other papers by Kira Bang Bové in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Torquil Watt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Asmus Vogel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laszlo Hegedüs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Jakob Bue Bjoerner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Palliative Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Mogens Groenvold in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steen Joop Bonnema in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Åse Krogh Rasmussen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
might be considered more reliable than the self-rated HADS in capturing symptoms of anxiety and depression. However, the validity of HADS is supported by studies of the English version of HADS, which report average sensitivities and specificities of 0
Search for other papers by Beata Rutkowska-Hinc in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Edyta Maj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna Jabłońska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Justyna Milczarek-Banach in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tomasz Bednarczuk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Piotr Miśkiewicz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
smoking, duration of thyroid disease and GO, CAS, proptosis, TSH, TBII, TPOAb, and TgAb concentrations, and the presence of typical signs of DON in MRI. The sensitivity and specificity of MI values, including 50, 55, and 60%, and the correlation between MI
Search for other papers by Eijun Nishihara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yoshitaka Hobo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Akira Miyauchi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yasuhiro Ito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Miyoko Higuchi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mitsuru Ito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shuji Fukata in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mitsushige Nishikawa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Takashi Akamizu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Thyroglobulin (Tg) is a thyroid-specific protein, and its serum levels are useful for monitoring patients with differentiated thyroid carcinomas (DTCs) who underwent total thyroidectomy. However, anti-Tg antibodies (TgAb) are
Search for other papers by Akira Miyauchi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Takumi Kudo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mitsuyoshi Hirokawa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yasuhiro Ito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Minoru Kihara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Takuya Higashiyama in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tomonori Yabuta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hiroo Masuoka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hisakazu Shindo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kaoru Kobayashi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Akihiro Miya in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, and that patients with high Ki-67 LI values had a significantly worse disease-specific survival than patients with low Ki-67 LI values [ 10 ]. We hypothesized that the Ki-67 LI might have a strong correlation with Tg-DT, since both factors are related
Search for other papers by Bülent Öcal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Demet Yılmazer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tuğba Taşkın Türkmenoğlu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ömer Bayır in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Güleser Saylam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Emel Çadallı Tatar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sevilay Karahan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Erman Çakal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
cutoff point, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for this established model were calculated as 74.5, 76.1, 82.7, and 66.0%, respectively. The AUC was found to be 0.784 ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ). Fig. 1